Itamar Rabinovitch
Now that the fighting in Georgia has died down, policy shapers and pundits in the West are free to analyze the maneuvers and results, and draw lessons. The picture that emerges is a dismal one. Vladimir Putin’s Russia exercised brutal force with the object of bringing a rebellious neighbor to its knees. The United States, which encouraged Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili to defy Moscow, did not give him any real support. Former Soviet republics and satellites will now think twice before confronting Russia, or will be tempted to seek shelter beneath the cover of the U.S., NATO or the European Union. Oil is now much less likely to reach the Caspian Sea without Russia’s involvement.
The Georgian crisis will have specific repercussions on the Middle East. There is less of a chance that the United States and Russia will be cooperating to stop Iran’s nuclear program. There is a greater chance that Russia will wage a more ambitious and aggressive policy, including selling advanced weapons systems to Iran and Syria. There will also be a host of indirect repercussions. In this context, there is a striking similarity between the Russian move in the Caucasus, and Iran and Syria’s move in Lebanon. More
Sphere: Related Content
August 19th, 2008 at 2:09 pm
[…] News » News Iran and Syria, in the role of Russia2008-08-19 13:10:16Is results, and pundits in the maneuvers and results, and results, and pundits in […]
August 20th, 2008 at 10:18 pm
[…] News » News Iran and Syria, in the role of Russia2008-08-20 21:18:46Is results, and pundits in the maneuvers and results, and results, and pundits in […]
August 21st, 2008 at 2:56 am
[…] News » News Iran and Syria, in the role of Russia2008-08-21 01:55:52Is results, and pundits in the maneuvers and results, and results, and pundits in […]
August 23rd, 2008 at 12:03 pm
[…] News » News Iran and Syria, in the role of Russia2008-08-23 11:03:33Is results, and pundits in the maneuvers and results, and results, and pundits in […]